Where to start › Planning ahead › The five-year window
The five-year window
Elsewhere we explain the look-back for families already in a crisis. This is the other side of the same rule: if you are not in a crisis, you are in the window where timing still helps. Nothing here is advice. It is the map of what an elder-law attorney works with, so you know what to ask.
The rule, precisely
For institutional and certain waiver long-term-care coverage, the federal look-back is 60 months. The detail most summaries get wrong: CMS measures it back from "the date that precedes by 60 months the point at which an individual has both applied for Medicaid and is an institutionalized individual."[1] Both conditions, not the application alone.
A transfer for less than fair market value inside that window can produce a penalty period, whose length is the amount transferred divided by the average monthly cost of nursing facility services in the state or locality.[1] It is not automatically five years.
California is different, and it is mid-transition. This page used to say California uses a 30-month look-back and that every other state uses five years. Here is the accurate version. Medi-Cal began counting assets again on 1 January 2026; DHCS's FAQ describes looking at assets given away in the 30 months before entering a nursing facility, says transfers on or after 1 January 2026 may cause a penalty, and says transfers before that date will not be counted.[2] But the review is being phased in: DHCS's eligibility letter applies eight reviewed months to long-term-care cases in September 2026, rising to the full 30 months for cases on or after 1 July 2028.[3] So a flat "California is 30 months" is not yet true. Date every California statement and check current DHCS guidance.
The consequence for planning is unchanged: anything that involves moving assets works only if it is done well before care is needed. The same trust, funded at two different times, produces opposite outcomes. The difference is the calendar.
The transfer exceptions, from the statute
These are written into 42 U.S.C. §1396p(c)(2), which is worth knowing exists before anyone tells you transfers are simply forbidden:[5]
- Assets transferred to a spouse, or to another person for the sole benefit of the spouse.
- To a child who is under 21, or blind, or permanently and totally disabled.
- The home to a son or daughter who lived in it for at least two years immediately before institutionalisation and who, as determined by the State, provided care that let the parent stay home — the caregiver child exemption.
- The home to a sibling who has an equity interest in it and lived there for at least one year immediately before institutionalisation.
- To certain trusts for a disabled person under 65.
"As determined by the State" is the phrase to notice. These exceptions are federal, and whether your facts meet them is a state determination. And note what an exception is not: a transfer exception does not create an estate-recovery exemption.
Spousal protections, dated
A spouse at home keeps a calculated share. CMS's 2026 standards put the community spouse resource allowance between a minimum of $32,532 and a maximum of $162,660, effective 1 January 2026, with a minimum monthly maintenance needs allowance of $2,705 in the 48 states.[6] These are federal minimums and maximums that change annually; what a state actually protects takes a calculation. The spouse-at-home page covers it.
The warning that saves real money
The IRS annual gift exclusion for 2026 is $19,000 per recipient — and for scale, the estate tax basic exclusion for people dying in 2026 is $15,000,000.[4] Those are gift and estate tax rules. They have nothing to do with Medicaid.
CMS's rule is the one that governs care: a person needing long-term services and supports "will be denied LTSS coverage if they have transferred assets for less than fair market value during the five-year period preceding their Medicaid application."[7]
So a grandparent making ordinary generous gifts inside the window can build a penalty without knowing it. Tax-free and penalty-free are different laws. What we will not do is tell you every gift is penalised — exceptions exist, states apply them, and the amount and purpose matter. The instruction is simply: before any money or property moves, ask a lawyer.
What we will not tell you about trusts
Asset-protection trusts are the tool families ask about most, so it matters that this page was overconfident about them. It gave a $2,000–$12,000 attorney cost range, said the grantor genuinely gives up control, and said funding must be complete five-plus years before applying. We could not verify any of that from a source we could open, and the underlying reality is that a trust's Medicaid effect depends on the document's terms, the timing, the state's rules, the pathway, and which rights the grantor keeps.
What we will say: some irrevocable trusts and other tools can change how assets are treated; the effect is specific to the instrument and the state; and nobody should transfer anything into one on the strength of a web page, including this one. Find a certified elder-law attorney through the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (naela.org), and note that we are also not going to describe aggressive gifting strategies. They exist, they are state-specific, and they are easy to get catastrophically wrong.
Where the public record stops
Who to ask: a certified elder-law attorney — your Area Agency on Aging can often refer one; your state Medicaid office for the current official limits.
What to ask them:
- Given our assets and timeline, which tools are even relevant to us?
- What are this state's current income, asset and home-equity limits, its look-back rules, and its penalty divisor?
- Would a trust make sense at our scale, and what exactly would be given up?
- Which statutory transfer exceptions might apply to us, and what proof would the state want?
- If we do nothing at all, what does the spend-down road look like for us?
Who helps you locally, free. Your Area Agency on Aging gives free options counseling. Reach any of them through the federal Eldercare Locator at 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov (Administration for Community Living).[8] An Area Agency on Aging does not give legal advice. More on the four people who help on Who helps me locally.
Quick answers
How far in advance do you have to plan for Medicaid?
Federal transfer rules for institutional and certain waiver long-term care use a 60-month look-back, measured back from the point at which a person has both applied for Medicaid and is an institutionalized individual. California works to a 30-month framework instead, but it is being phased in: Medi-Cal began counting assets again on 1 January 2026, and DHCS's transition applies the full 30-month review to long-term-care cases on or after 1 July 2028. Anything that involves moving assets needs to be done well before care is needed, and checked against current state guidance. [1, 2, 3]
Can my parents give away $19,000 a year without affecting Medicaid?
No, and this is the most expensive misunderstanding in the field. The IRS annual gift exclusion for 2026 is $19,000 per recipient, and that is a federal gift-tax rule. It creates no Medicaid safe harbour. CMS: beneficiaries who need long-term services and supports "will be denied LTSS coverage if they have transferred assets for less than fair market value during the five-year period preceding their Medicaid application." That said, not every gift automatically creates a penalty — exceptions exist and the state applies them, which is why this is a question for a lawyer and not a rule of thumb. [4, 5]
What is a Medicaid asset protection trust?
An irrevocable trust intended to hold assets so they stop counting toward Medicaid limits. Beyond that, we have removed what this page used to say. It gave an attorney cost range of $2,000 to $12,000, said the grantor "genuinely gives up control", and stated that funding must happen five-plus years before applying. We could not verify any of that against a source we could open, and in truth a trust's effect depends on the document, the timing, the state, the Medicaid pathway and which rights are retained. Ask an elder-law attorney; do not plan from a fee range or a slogan.
Sources and what they support
Sources checked 2026-09-19 using AI-assisted editorial research. This is a source check, not legal or tax advice.
- CMS State Medicaid Director Letter SMD#18-004, 17 April 2018. Supports the quoted definition of the 60-month look-back running from the point at which a person has both applied and is an institutionalized individual, and the penalty calculation dividing the amount transferred by the average monthly cost of nursing facility services in the state or locality. Guidance to states on penalty start dates for certain waiver applicants; it concerns institutional and covered long-term-care pathways rather than every Medicaid pathway.
- California DHCS, Medi-Cal asset limit FAQ. Supports that Medi-Cal began counting assets on 1 January 2026, the 30-month look at assets given away before entering a nursing facility, and that transfers on or after 1 January 2026 may cause a penalty while earlier transfers are not counted. California-only consumer guidance, superseded whenever DHCS updates it. The URL previously used on this page no longer resolves.
- California DHCS All County Welfare Directors Letter 25-18. Supports the transition under which the number of months reviewed for long-term-care applications and entries rises over time, from eight months for September 2026 cases to the full 30 months for cases on or after 1 July 2028. A county-administration instruction; read it with the consumer FAQ, and do not treat the eventual 30-month review as fully in force in 2026.
- IRS, tax inflation adjustments for tax year 2026. Supports that the annual exclusion for gifts remains at $19,000 for 2026 and that the estate tax basic exclusion amount for decedents dying in 2026 is $15,000,000. These are federal gift and estate tax figures. They have no bearing on Medicaid eligibility, which is the entire point of citing them here.
- 42 U.S.C. §1396p(c)(2), transfers of assets. Supports each listed exception: spouse and sole-benefit-of-spouse transfers; a child under 21 or blind or permanently and totally disabled; the son-or-daughter caregiver exception with its two-year residence and "as determined by the State" care test; the sibling exception requiring an equity interest and one year of residence; and certain trusts for a disabled person under 65. Statutory text — the states administer these and decide whether a given transaction qualifies, and none of these is an estate-recovery exemption.
- CMS informational bulletin, updated 2026 SSI and spousal impoverishment standards (27 April 2026). Supports the community spouse resource allowance minimum of $32,532 and maximum of $162,660 effective 1 January 2026, and the $2,705 minimum monthly maintenance needs allowance for the 48 states. Federal minimums and maximums only; states apply their own procedures within them and the next annual bulletin supersedes these figures.
- CMS, Medicaid eligibility policy. Supports the quoted rule that beneficiaries who need long-term services and supports will be denied that coverage if they transferred assets for less than fair market value in the five years before applying, and that 36 states and DC operate spend-down programs. A federal overview; it does not list state exceptions or limits.
- Administration for Community Living, Eldercare Locator. Supports the referral route to a local Area Agency on Aging. It does not give legal advice or determine eligibility.
Corrected in this pass: "five years in every state except California" was an overbroad national comparison, and California's 30-month framework is now dated and given with its phase-in to 1 July 2028; the look-back start date now follows CMS's definition rather than "before the application"; the trust cost range, the "genuinely gives up control" claim and the universal five-plus-year funding rule are removed as unverified; and two commercial Medicaid-planning sites no longer carry claims on this page.